Penny Stocks ohio
In 2012 will the Republicans name what wealthy foreigners contributed to Obama’s $750M 2008 Campaign Fund?
Now remember in the state of the union address OBAMA insinuated that the supreme court was allowing corporations “owned by other than Americans” to contribute huge sums of money influencing election outcome etc.
“NOTE” I am nonpartisan in the respect i don’t want Representative Govt at all, i want well manage fire at will employees that are useful & effective. Plus do what the public wants done. I want a different form of govt & business structure altogether.
Most of Dems. campaign money comes from people, unions, organizations that advocate some type of social issue. I however will research it. I know at least that he has not promoted any company. This is what is now. During the Bush presidency we lost 43,000 INDUSTRIES, all subsidized by our tax dollars. With those we lost 15 MILLION jobs. Then he said he created jobs by giving tax breaks? Jobs in China do not benefit the US worker and does not increase our tax revenue.The tax payers helped those companies invest with those subsidies, they expanded, moved away and yet none of those companies pay a penny in taxes in the US but their stock holders take the profits. How those that help? To me that is stealing the tax from citizens and giving it away. They created jobs overseas, poverty in the US and abuses in the workplace. When is the Republican base going to wake up
This table lists the top donors to this candidate in the 2008 election cycle. The organizations themselves did not donate , rather the money came from the organization’s PAC, its individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals’ immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.
Because of contribution limits, organizations that bundle together many individual contributions are often among the top donors to presidential candidates. These contributions can come from the organization’s members or employees (and their families). The organization may support one candidate, or hedge its bets by supporting multiple candidates. Groups with national networks of donors – like EMILY’s List and Club for Growth – make for particularly big bundlers.
University of California $1,591,395
Goldman Sachs $994,795
Harvard University $854,747
Microsoft Corp $833,617
Google Inc $803,436
Citigroup Inc $701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
Time Warner $590,084
Sidley Austin LLP $588,598
Stanford University $586,557
National Amusements Inc $551,683
UBS AG $543,219
Wilmerhale Llp $542,618
Skadden, Arps et al $530,839
IBM Corp $528,822
Columbia University $528,302
Morgan Stanley $514,881
General Electric $499,130
US Government $494,820
Latham & Watkins $493,835
Percent of Contributions Coded How to read this chart
Why (and How) We Use Donors’ Employer/Occupation Information
NOTE: All the numbers on this page are for the 2008 election cycle and based on Federal Election Commission data released electronically on Monday, July 13, 2009.
(“Help! The numbers don’t add up…”)
Feel free to distribute or cite this material, but please credit the Center for Responsive Politics. For permission to reprint for commercial uses, such as textbooks, contact the Center.
Republicans governors complain that their states are broke and that they have to make cut, assign corporations to take over. Then if that is true how come they want to privatize and they want to invest our tax dollars is corporations. Let’s analyze: In other words they take our tax dollars, invest it in companies, and the return of those investments go to the stock holders. How does the tax payers and the cities benefit from that if we are the ones investing but they are the ones who get the profits.
The governor or Ohio made himself chairman of Jobs Ohio, (it is on you tube) want to privatize the liquor system in a way that the tax will be paid to a private company. Which mean they are using the tax dollars that people pay when they buy liquor and GIVE IT AWAY. That is revenue for the state why would they give it away? Somebody mentioned the phrase “privatize the profit but increase the risk to the state”. Tax payers put the money but they take the profit. But if they loose, the state will have to cover the loss. You and I. (sorry for the typos)
If we examine the purpose of why does a company exists: the first that comes to mind is share holders. They hire a person to bring about the desire objective. The objective is usually MONEY. This person they hire is hired on the basis of how much money can he/she brings into the company.
If we profile a company we will find out that such company is a sociopath that has no regard for human suffering, is not interested in the safety of others, lies or hides harmful facts for profit, and it is incapable of feeling guilt. Our experience tells us that they prefer to pay fines rather than to be in compliance with social rules meant to protect people as well as the environment.
NTEK Nanotech Entmt In Com Thought Process Buy Alert 1022013 PennyStocksPAYD
2011 SAGE Hit #37 Cameron Heyward NM-MT
2011 SAGE Hit #37 Cameron Heyward NM-MT…
2011 SAGE Hit #12 Dane Sanzenbacher NM-MT
2011 SAGE Hit #12 Dane Sanzenbacher NM-MT…